The MQ Pro train doesn’t stop when we move onto networking performance either, with WiFi tests showing it 60% and 17.37% faster during download and upload testing. If you compare it to a 512MB board, your results will likely differ! The MQ Pro also gets an advantage from its newer DDR3 memory and this is clearly shown across the board with tinymembench and CacheBench with performance increases between 20% and nearly 700%! tinymembench CacheBench Networking Performance It should be noted that we are testing the 1GB RAM model of the MangoPi MQ Pro here.
UnixBench PHPBench PyBench WavPack Audio Encoding Crypto++ OpenSSL Bench GZIP Compression Memory (RAM) Performance
With GZIP, it’s 34.98% faster to complete the same test, OpenSSL benchmarks show around 50% increases across the board and whilst with Crypto++’s Integer and Elliptical curve run the MQ Pro pulls ahead by 31.23%, Keyed and Unkeyed Algorithm runs were 20.73% and 10.91% faster respectively. When we move to GZIP compression, Crypto++ and OpenSSL work though, the Pi Zero W starts to fight back. PyBench also completes 22.26% faster and the WavPack encoding test is 7.43% quicker on the MangoPi board. The Mango Pi MQ Pro under PHPBench testing shows a 50.31% performance increase over the Raspberry Pi Zero W and its compute dominance doesn’t end there. Compute PerformanceĪs always, I’ll start with UnixBench and move on to a mix of “real-world” and other synthetic benchmarks. A 120mm fan is blowing across the board for all tests (unless mentioned) to ensure no thermal throttling takes place.
For USB Ethernet, I use the Linksys 1Gbit USB Ethernet adapter. *4Kp30 HDMI output may have limited support in applications Benchmarking Information / Hardwareįor these benchmarks, the boot storage is the best-performing Amazon Basics 64GB microSD card and the SSD is a Samsung 850 EVO (500GB). 1GHz Allwinner D1 C906 RISC-V Processing UnitĤ0 Pin Raspberry Pi compatible GPIO header
0 kommentar(er)
